Forum:Should we allow rollbackers to issue Level 3 warnings?

In light of a few recent ideas that have come into my head, I would like to start a discussion as to whether Rollbackers should be allowed to issue level 3 warnings.

Previously, as with the Sims wiki, on this wiki, rollbackers have been limited to level 1 and 2 warnings only. However the policies on this wiki state that as an administrator, a user doesn't have to issue a warning, they can just cut straight to a 24 hour block, or a 2 hour one in the case of a newbie who accidentally violated a policy.

Also the way I see it, rollbackers and regular users are not the same thing. Rollbackers are able to revert vandalism, and because they have a tool that one does not have access to by default, they are sometimes thought of as being above regular users. I'm also wondering this, since this proposed policy will allow users to continue using the level 3 warnings, since administrators and bureaucrats do not have to use them.

I know that since I'm like, the only user on this wiki, the odds are that this will go unnoticed and the proposed policies are just a waste of time. But I feel that this will be a good way for me to develop a stronger concept of being a community leader, even if the only people I am a leader to, are myself, my conscience, and any newbie that just happen to stumble across here.

If users are not comfortable with giving their names, I won't scold those unknown people to the air. That's why I've given users the option to vote using a poll.

--  C.Syde  ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 21:18, January 25, 2015 (UTC)

Voting shall last for five days. Time remaining:

Poll
Should we allow rollbackers to issue level 3 warnings on my test wiki? Yes I think it's a good idea. No I think it's a bad idea. Policy? What policy?!